Only Duped Amerika is Denied Cold Fusion

They came up with bogus straw men uh
0:03
arguments against it. Did politicking
0:06
and story planting in the press and I uh
0:09
eventually realized that there was a
0:11
rotten game going on.
0:13
Could you give a bit more about the
0:14
motivation why someone would want to be
0:17
destructive of good news? You
0:19
well they were very fearful. They
0:21
realized that it was real and then tried
0:23
to suppress it.
0:24
He died as soon as he began to speak.
0:26
Back in 1989, the world came within
0:28
inches of changing forever. A discovery
0:31
so dangerous to those in power, it was
0:34
buried the moment it appeared. When he
0:36
started exposing what he had been warned
0:38
never to reveal, it didn't take long
0:40
before he was found murdered in
0:41
Connecticut.
0:42
The first assault was by planting
0:44
negative stories in the press. And
0:46
people at MIT, I regret to say, were the
0:49
first people to promote the idea that
0:52
this was fraud. We found a rare
0:54
recording of his testimony. It was
0:56
recorded on April 23rd, 1998. It's raw,
1:00
unpolished, and unsettling. His words
1:03
are too important to filter or
1:04
reinterpret. So, you hear them exactly
1:06
as he said them. Listen carefully.
1:09
So, there was a compulsion by the the
1:11
Secretary of Energy in the new Bush
1:13
administration to get to the bottom of
1:15
this. And so, I had to tell the press
1:18
what the status was. And I had to ask
1:20
them. had to find a spokespeople. Uh
1:24
there became I must say one a very
1:26
positive person toward very quickly uh
1:30
at MIT whose name was professor Peter
1:32
Hegelstein in electrical engineering.
1:34
Now when he came out with that theory at
1:36
MIT there was hell to pay and he has
1:39
paid a very big price. Back in 1989 the
1:42
world came within inches of changing
1:44
forever. A discovery so powerful it was
1:47
buried before it could spread. And today
1:50
we're facing a new kind of revolution.
1:52
Only this time, it's in plain sight.
1:55
Artificial intelligence. Before we go
1:57
deeper into this hidden story, a quick
1:59
word from today's sponsor, Outskill, who
2:02
are opening doors to a revolution of
2:03
their own. This weekend, they're hosting
2:05
a 2-day AI mastermind workshop live on
2:08
Saturday and Sunday from 10:00 a.m. to
2:09
7:00 p.m. In just 16 hours, expert
2:12
mentors will take you from beginner to
2:13
pro, covering 10 plus powerful AI tools,
2:16
prompt engineering, workflow automation,
2:18
and even building apps and websites with
2:20
zero code. Now, here's the exciting
2:22
part. The training normally costs $895,
2:25
but I've partnered with Outskll to give
2:27
away 1,000 free seats for 72 hours only.
2:30
That's nearly $900,000 worth of training
2:32
free for my viewers. It's rated 4.9 out
2:35
of five on Trustpilot and over 10
2:37
million people have already attended in
2:39
the past year. You'll also get lifetime
2:41
access to Outskill's private AI
2:42
community of 5,000 plus professionals, a
2:45
seamless learning dashboard for easy
2:46
progress, and if you sign up now, you'll
2:48
unlock $5,100 in exclusive bonuses. Day
2:52
one, the prompt bible with 3,000 plus
2:54
prompts. Day two, a road map to monetize
2:57
AI, plus a personalized AI toolkit
3:00
builder if you attend both days. Seats
3:02
are limited and filling fast. Use the
3:04
link in the description and join their
3:05
WhatsApp community to stay updated.
3:11
On March 23rd, 1989, the unthinkable
3:14
happened. At the University of Utah, two
3:17
respected chemists stood before cameras
3:19
and announced they had split the atom,
3:21
not in a reactor, but in a glass jar.
3:24
heavy water, palladium, and a trickle of
3:27
current producing more energy than it
3:29
consumed. If real, it meant infinite
3:33
clean power from ordinary water. For a
3:36
brief moment, the world believed the
3:37
future had arrived. But almost as
3:39
quickly, the miracle of the century was
3:41
branded the joke of the decade.
3:43
What happened was that on March 23rd,
3:46
1989, something caught us all by
3:48
surprise. In the afternoon, there was an
3:51
announcement by Drs. Martin Fleshman and
3:54
Stanley Ponds at the University of Utah
3:58
stating that they had
4:00
performed what appeared to be some type
4:03
of nuclear process in a small vessel jar
4:09
test tube as it were of heavy water with
4:12
palladium. More heat was coming out,
4:15
they said,
4:17
than could possibly be accounted for by
4:19
the electricity going in and any known
4:22
chemical reactions. Even when the
4:24
laughter died down, one man refused to
4:26
move on. Eugene Malow, an engineer with
4:30
degrees from MIT and Harvard. Unlike
4:32
many of his colleagues, Malow didn't
4:34
dismiss the Utah team outright. He had
4:36
seen too much to believe the story was
4:38
over. And when internal data from MIT's
4:41
own replication experiments crossed his
4:43
desk, he noticed something disturbing.
4:46
The early draft charts showed signs of
4:48
excess heat in heavy water experiments,
4:51
exactly what pawns and Flechman had
4:53
claimed. But in the final version, the
4:55
curves looked different. The upward
4:57
trace of energy had been pushed
4:59
downward, flattening out the evidence.
5:01
To Malow, it was not an accident. It was
5:04
a deliberate adjustment designed to
5:06
erase a positive signal. Malov knew what
5:09
he had seen and by speaking out he
5:12
crossed a line few dared to cross. Years
5:15
later he would pay the ultimate price.
5:17
On July 10th,
5:21
the data that was in the MIT draft
5:24
report as made by one individual on the
5:27
team of 16
5:29
showed excess heat on the graph at least
5:32
the semi-processed
5:35
raw data you might say. There it was.
5:38
Excess heat in the heavy water
5:40
experiment. No excess heat in the
5:43
lightwater experiment. Now three and
5:45
then there was text for that report for
5:48
that section of the report the
5:49
calerimemetry part of the report which
5:51
they had very much deemphasized because
5:53
they weren't interested in that really.
5:55
3 days later I had the comparison what
5:59
went into the final report and which was
6:01
published by the journal of fusion
6:03
energy and was widely touted and and the
6:06
conclusion was in the DOE report. They
6:09
had kept the lightwater experiment the
6:12
control experiment they had done the
6:14
appropriate time averaging
6:17
uh uh in hour they had averaged over
6:21
each hour and made one point that was
6:23
okay. So what you saw in the control
6:25
experiment case where there was no
6:26
excess heat, you saw it get averaged and
6:29
you saw the curve and you could overlay
6:31
them and this one could be this new
6:34
curve which was to be published. You
6:37
could see how it was legitimately the
6:40
reflection of the earlier unaveraged raw
6:43
data. Okay. But in the case of the the
6:46
heavy water situation, these curves were
6:49
utterly unlike one another. one had been
6:52
radically shifted downward.
6:55
And it turned out later that there was
6:56
even worse than I thought. I thought
6:58
they had just taken the whole data and
6:59
just shifted it down. And I searched for
7:01
a reason why that would have been done.
7:03
And there was no reason. I did some
7:06
detective work behind the scenes to find
7:07
out if there was a legitimate reason.
7:09
There was no legitimate reason. And
7:11
there never has been and never will be.
7:14
And furthermore, it has been analyzed by
7:16
others more in a more sophisticated way
7:19
than the analysis I applied. And they
7:21
found out that there was absolutely no
7:24
way whatsoever of taking the data from
7:27
the preliminary July 10th version and
7:30
going to the July 13th version which was
7:33
89 which was published and ever coming
7:36
up with that by what is called a linear
7:38
transformation. It had to be highly
7:40
manipulated and in other fields we would
7:43
call that fraud and I state that it was
7:46
fraud. This was no trivial slip. MIT's
7:49
published report became one of the most
7:51
influential documents used to discredit
7:53
cold fusion around the world. According
7:56
to Malow, those altered graphs gave
7:58
skeptics the ammunition they needed to
8:00
declare the field dead. If the nation's
8:02
top technical university couldn't
8:04
reproduce the results, then clearly the
8:06
whole thing was nonsense. Or so the
8:08
narrative went. But Malow insisted the
8:11
truth was far messier. He called it what
8:13
no one else dared to, fraud.
8:16
And furthermore,
8:18
in the entire bigger picture, forgetting
8:20
now for the moment just that curve
8:23
shifting, which is fraud. Okay. The big
8:27
picture is that they used their
8:30
conclusions which were totally
8:32
inappropriate to continue the charade uh
8:36
to 1998 and and onward that there's
8:39
nothing to call fusion. The big
8:41
university MIT and its experts concluded
8:45
uh that it was nonsense. That's the
8:47
worst fraud. But if someone wants to get
8:50
the real smoking gun and say, "Did they
8:52
ever do an experiment that looked like
8:54
it might be promising?" They were duty
8:56
bound to publish that experiment and say
8:58
if they wanted, okay, here are the arrow
9:00
bars that show the errors we might have
9:03
made there. And so we look at that curve
9:05
and we say that it really doesn't prove
9:08
what Ponzip Fleshman was doing. In fact,
9:11
they also wrote in the language there
9:13
and they changed the language from July
9:16
10th through July 13th and showed that
9:18
they were matching their negative
9:20
conclusion to the uh shifting of the
9:24
data. I would not have objected if they
9:27
had just showed the data and said we
9:29
don't think that means it's called
9:30
fusion and it's not. But I think most
9:32
people would then have looked at the
9:34
data and would have said how can you say
9:36
there's nothing here? you've only done
9:38
one experiment for 80 hours in a
9:41
comparison test. You better go back and
9:42
do that again. The lower echelon fellow
9:45
at MIT under no circumstances would have
9:48
presented to his boss Ronald Parker the
9:52
shocking uh news that they that MIT was
9:55
going to be forced to present a
9:57
nominally positive result. It he just
10:01
couldn't do it. He couldn't bring
10:02
himself to do it. He didn't have the
10:03
integrity to do it. Had he the integrity
10:05
to do it, the whole story would have
10:07
been different.
10:08
They massaged the data and in doing so,
10:11
they rewrote history. But the graphs
10:13
were only the beginning. What started in
10:15
the basement of one university was about
10:17
to reach the halls of government where
10:19
the final blow would be struck. By the
10:22
summer of 1989, the excitement that once
10:24
surrounded cold fusion had turned into a
10:26
firestorm of controversy. The US
10:28
Department of Energy stepped in, forming
10:30
a special panel of experts to give an
10:32
official verdict. Scientists across the
10:34
world waited anxiously. If the panel
10:36
found the claims credible, billions
10:39
could be redirected into a new line of
10:41
research that promised unlimited energy.
10:43
But if they ruled against it, the story
10:46
would be over before it truly began. And
10:48
the result came swiftly. By July, just a
10:51
few short months after the Utah press
10:53
conference, the panel declared there was
10:55
insufficient evidence to support cold
10:57
fusion. It was a death sentence written
11:00
in bureaucratic language. With that
11:02
single decision, government funding
11:05
dried up. Universities that had been
11:07
curious shut their doors. Promising
11:09
researchers abandoned the field, fearing
11:11
the label of pseudocience. Patents tied
11:14
to Cold Fusion were quietly rejected or
11:16
stalled in the system. Those who dared
11:19
to believe suddenly found themselves
11:20
blacklisted, ridiculed, and without
11:22
resources. For the establishment, it was
11:25
easier to declare the matter finished
11:27
than to risk undermining existing
11:29
programs in hot fusion which already
11:31
commanded billions in funding or to
11:34
threaten the global energy economy built
11:36
on oil. We are not talking about a small
11:38
issue here. This is not uh whether some
11:42
uh some uh obscure theory is right or
11:45
wrong and then this group is right and
11:46
that group is wrong about how to
11:48
theorize about something. This is the
11:50
very lifeblood of civilization. This is
11:52
energy. Thousands of children die every
11:55
week or every day because they do not
11:57
have clean water. And these small
11:59
compact energy sources, just as an
12:01
example, could save their lives. Okay?
12:04
And we do not have that now. If the
12:06
government had done the right thing and
12:08
had at least been neutral about this and
12:11
had instead of MIT hot fusioners and
12:14
propagandists, if they had not uh uh
12:18
insisted on killing it to save their own
12:21
funding and they make large salaries,
12:23
one in particular there, the head of the
12:26
Hot Fusion Lab at the time, he now makes
12:28
500,000 a year, his house allowance plus
12:31
his very high salary.
12:33
We
12:35
[Music]
12:39
What would have happened what would have
12:41
happened is that
12:46
science would have proceeded in a
12:48
reasonable way.
12:49
Now it wasn't about the truth anymore.
12:52
It was about protecting billion dollar
12:53
hot fusion budgets, political prestige,
12:56
and the profits of fossil fuel empires.
12:59
And when so much money and power are at
13:01
stake, the knives always come out. But
13:04
the real tragedy wasn't in Washington.
13:07
It was in the world outside the lab.
13:09
Malow said what was buried in 1989 could
13:13
have saved countless lives had it been
13:15
pursued with honesty and urgency.
13:17
Imagine small affordable power units
13:19
bringing electricity to villages with no
13:21
grid, purifying drinking water where
13:23
children die daily from contamination,
13:26
and replacing the burning of fossil
13:27
fuels that choke the atmosphere.
13:29
According to Malow, this wasn't just a
13:32
scientific controversy. It was a lost
13:34
opportunity that stretched across
13:36
decades. Instead of developing a clean,
13:39
virtually limitless energy source,
13:41
humanity stayed locked in the same cycle
13:43
of oil dependence, pollution, and energy
13:46
poverty. While governments funneled
13:48
billions into hot fusion machines that
13:49
still can't break even after half a
13:51
century, cold fusion research was left
13:53
to wither on the margins, dismissed as
13:56
fantasy. Malow believed that this delay
13:59
cost millions of lives. Lives that could
14:01
have been extended with cheap
14:02
electricity, safe drinking water, and
14:05
modern healthcare powered by abundant
14:06
energy.
14:07
But frankly, the worst consequence for
14:09
them if they look themselves in the
14:10
mirror once all this technology is is uh
14:14
out and we're running uh uh you know non
14:17
fossil fuel sources, non conventional
14:20
fision sources, they will have to look
14:22
themselves in the face and in the mirror
14:24
and say uh look what I did. I delayed a
14:27
technology for many years and that's why
14:29
I think this is a very serious matter.
14:31
This is not this is not a game. This is
14:34
not an academic exercise. This is life
14:37
and death and this is above all for the
14:40
world hope that was killed or
14:42
temporarily killed in 1989. All right.
14:46
The world needs a large dose of hope for
14:48
many reasons. You know, there's a lot of
14:50
concern about the environment and to
14:54
have participated in a a conspiracy, a
14:57
public conspiracy, not a smoke filled
15:00
room conspiracy, a publicly
15:03
acknowledged conspiracy almost out in
15:05
the open kind of conspiracy to kill
15:09
an idea, not an idea, but a real
15:11
technology as we now see as commercial
15:14
developments are occurring uh is a
15:16
disgraceful thing. uh millions of people
15:18
in effect have needlessly died. We will
15:21
never get back the 9 years or so or
15:26
however you want to rate it uh when it
15:29
should have been taken seriously. All
15:31
that time is gone and will never come
15:33
back again. So whenever these devices
15:35
are developed and used, that period of
15:37
time of delay uh which is on the order
15:40
of 9 years, you could argue maybe 7
15:44
years, uh it's gone and won't come back.
15:48
His words were blunt. Millions died
15:50
because it was suppressed. Even if you
15:53
don't fully accept his numbers, the
15:55
scale of what might have been lost is
15:57
impossible to ignore. He didn't just
15:59
warn the world, he lived the
16:01
consequences of exposing it. Not long
16:04
after making these claims public, he was
16:06
found murdered in Connecticut. Because
16:08
if there was even a fraction of truth in
16:11
those early experiments, then the
16:13
suppression of coal fusion wasn't just a
16:15
mistake. It was one of the greatest
16:17
crimes against humanity ever committed.
16:20
They thought the verdict was final. But
16:22
the truth has a way of clawing back from
16:23
the grave. And in hidden labs across the
16:26
world, the silence began to crack. Even
16:29
after the US government and major
16:31
universities declared cold fusion dead,
16:33
not everyone walked away. In Japan,
16:35
Italy, and a handful of smaller labs
16:37
across the world, researchers quietly
16:39
kept experimenting. They reported
16:42
flashes of strange results, bursts of
16:44
excess heat, unexplained energy outputs,
16:46
and in some cases, signs of actual
16:49
nuclear changes happening inside their
16:51
devices. These were not the headlines of
16:54
1989, but scattered reports that
16:56
suggested something important was still
16:59
hiding in the data. One of the most
17:01
intriguing threads came from Japan. At
17:04
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, a physicist
17:06
named Yoshiaki Uramura and his team
17:08
pushed detium through palladium layered
17:10
with other metals. To their surprise,
17:13
they claimed to see elements shift atoms
17:15
apparently transforming into new
17:17
elements. To mainstream science, it
17:19
sounded impossible. But the experiments
17:21
were repeated and observed, showing
17:24
consistent patterns that demanded
17:25
attention. These results hinted at
17:28
processes that classical physics could
17:30
not yet explain. In 2004, the Department
17:33
of Energy revisited the subject. The
17:35
official line was still skeptical, but
17:37
this time the report acknowledged that
17:39
there were anomalies worth testing. It
17:42
was not an endorsement, but it was a
17:44
crack in the wall that had been built in
17:46
1989. has already been exhibited in
17:48
their experiments to evolve more than a
17:50
thousand times the chemical energy if
17:54
you just burn that hydrogen. So even
17:56
though today conventional hydrogen
17:58
energy is the good thing, you have to
18:00
make it somehow with energy. But what
18:02
Randall Mills is saying at the Black
18:04
Light Power Corporation is that if we
18:08
use this process that they've developed
18:10
and and patented in Australia, uh we can
18:14
get a thousand times the energy out of
18:17
of ordinary hydrogen, which means fill
18:19
up your car with a tank full of water,
18:21
20 gallons of water or so, drive a 200
18:24
horsepower car, as he would as he stated
18:26
in our magazine, drive it uh at 60 m
18:30
hour, 100,000 miles. That's what one
18:33
tank full of water will do. According to
18:35
his modest theory,
18:37
according to co fusion theory,
18:41
a relatively small smaller amount of
18:43
water, not not even a 20- gallallon
18:45
tank, appropriate kind of water and what
18:47
have you, might drive the car millions
18:49
of miles. So, we're talking about a
18:51
powerful agent of change here. 1989 was
18:55
the year hope was buried, sealed away
18:57
under ridicule and denial. Yet, truth
19:00
has a strange way of resurfacing. Even
19:02
when the world tries to drown it, cold
19:05
fusion remains a shadow on the edge of
19:07
science, a possibility that refuses to
19:09
die. So ask yourself, what if the future
19:13
didn't fail, but was pushed aside? And
19:16
what happens when it finally pushes