Seven 300-foot Tuning Fork Structures Evidenced Under Giza Pyramid

Seven 300-foot Tuning Fork Structures Evidenced Under Giza Pyramid

Did the Ancients use Sound the way we use Electricity? Was Giza broadcasting piezo-electric power subterraneanly?

The already massive pyramids have become orders of magnitude more massive.

When we look at the SAR rendering of the alleged Khafre anomaly, we see a number of elements which if to scale would have to be absolutely colossal in size and weight. Here we see five stress relieving chamber-like superstructures similar to the one found above the King’s Chamber in the Khufu pyramid. The superstructure has a gabled roof and is made up of alternating layers of five massive granite slabs and empty space, totaling a weight of about 2500 tons. The Khafre structure has five of these superstructures for a total mass of 12,500 tons, but perhaps far heavier if the rendering is to scale. Another curious element is a rectangular prism which looks similar to what are known as the black boxes at the Serapeum of Saqqara. These are said to be massive, black granite sarcophagi for the sacred Apis bulls. These prisms weigh up to 100 tons each but still seem to be dwarfed by the apparent prism shown in the model. Not to mention the huge tuning forks which are lined up on one side and implied to have prongs about 300 feet in length, again if to scale. Certain angles show the megastructure being connected into the very base of the Khafre pyramid or perhaps the base long before the pyramids were even built. The base itself wouldn’t move up and down as it is a part of the bedrock, nor anything resting atop, but it would be inundated with powerful infrasonic vibrations via the titanic springs and tuning forks. The sheer amount of implied mass being sent into resonant oscillation by the Earth’s microseismic vibrations is frightening as it would possess unstoppable momentum and unfathomable amounts of kinetic and potential energy. But how could this energy be transmitted and utilized?

You are aware yes of the LAND OF CHEM research examining the pyramids as industrial-scale chemical production facilities

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxf2TPZAgW4

Seven 300-foot Tuning Fork structures evidenced under Giza Pyramid

Seven 300-foot Tuning Fork structures evidenced under Giza Pyramid

20250808 034753

20250808 033130

20250808 034456

20250808 033145

20250808 034537

20250808 034519

20250808 033158

20250808 033215

20250808 034607

Lab model

20250808 033248

20250808 033305

20250808 033406

20250808 033435

20250808 033444

20250808 033511

20250808 033525

20250808 033544

20250808 033553

20250808 033622

20250808 033634

20250808 033654

20250808 033722

20250808 033953

20250808 034009

20250808 034024

20250808 034121

Transcript

Click to reveal
So when we look at the SAR rendering of
0:01
the alleged coffrey anomaly, we see a
0:03
number of elements which if the scale
0:05
would have to be absolutely colossal in
0:07
size and weight. Here we see five stress
0:09
relieving chamberlike superructures
0:11
similar to the one found above the
0:12
king's chamber in the Kufu pyramid. The
0:15
superructure has a gabled roof and is
0:17
made up of alternating layers of five
0:19
massive granite slabs and empty space
0:21
totaling a weight of about 2500 tons.
0:25
The Coffrey structure has five of these
0:26
superructures for a total mass of 12,500
0:29
tons, but perhaps far heavier if the
0:32
rendering is to scale. Another curious
0:34
element is a rectangular prism, which
0:36
looks similar to what are known as the
0:38
black boxes of the Sarapium Fakara.
0:41
These are said to be massive black
0:43
granite sarcophagi for the sacred apis
0:45
bulls. These prisms weigh up to 100 tons
0:48
each, but still seem to be dwarfed by
0:50
the apparent prisms shown in the model.
0:53
Not to mention the huge tuning forks
0:55
which are lined up on the one side and
0:57
implied to have prongs about 300 ft in
0:59
length. Again, if the scale certain
1:03
angles show the mega structure being
1:05
connected into the very base of the
1:06
Coffrey pyramid or perhaps the base long
1:08
before the pyramids were even built. The
1:10
base itself wouldn't move up and down as
1:12
it is part of the bedrock nor anything
1:14
resting at top, but it would be inidated
1:17
with powerful infrasonic vibrations via
1:19
the Titanic springs and tuning forks.
1:21
The sheer amount of implied mass being
1:23
sent into resonant oscillation by the
1:25
Earth's microscismic vibrations is
1:27
frightening as it would possess
1:28
unstoppable momentum and unfampable
1:30
amounts of kinetic and potential energy.
1:33
But how could this energy be transmitted
1:34
and utilized? Well, as we see in the
1:37
physical model here, tuning force in any
1:39
vertical orientation as those in the SAR
1:41
model could convert the transverse
1:43
oscillations of the springs into
1:44
longitudinal vibrations which would
1:46
radiate out into the surrounding space.
1:49
And as shown here, this wireless
1:51
acoustic energy could induce sympathetic
1:52
vibrations into any objects tuned to the
1:54
same frequency, resulting in physical
1:57
propulsion and force. And as with the
2:00
pipes here, acoustic energy can travel
2:02
through any suitable conduit, including
2:04
tunnels and incending shafts to the
2:06
earth's surface where it could be
2:07
utilized in various ways such as
2:09
acoustic lubrication. This occurs when
2:12
vibrations reduce the coefficient of
2:13
friction, making a mass much easier to
2:16
move. Under certain conditions, the mass
2:18
could even move on its own. Ancient
2:20
texts are full of implications of
2:22
weighty objects being moved by certain
2:24
sounds without heavy machinery.
2:26
Coincidence?
2:28
This vibrational energy could also be
2:30
used for acoustically enhanced cutting,
2:32
telecommunications,
2:34
vibrational medicine, even acoustic
2:36
lighting. This proposed system is
2:38
practically a variant of Nicola Tesla's
2:40
wireless power scheme, but using
2:43
acoustic instead of electrical
2:44
vibrations. It was always a question as
2:46
to how the ancients would have derived
2:48
the energy to power such proposed
2:50
acoustic technology. Could this be the
2:52
answer? Did the ancients use sound the
2:55
way we use electricity?

Visited 2 times, 1 visit(s) today

Leave a Comment

Please disable your adblocker or whitelist this site!