Every Third Bealtes Song Performed Live was a Cover Tune

Every Third Bealtes Song Performed Live was a Cover Tune

Yes, it’s accurate to say that during their early live performances, The Beatles frequently played cover songs—especially during their Hamburg (1960–1962) and Cavern Club (1961–1963) years.

Key Points:

  • Sage of Quay is a YouTuber known for exploring conspiratorial and alternative narratives, including theories about The Beatles—often claiming things like Paul McCartney’s replacement, and questioning the band’s authenticity or control.
  • The claim that 30% of Beatles live songs were covers is reasonable, especially for the pre-fame and early-fame years.
  • Examples of commonly performed covers by The Beatles:
  • Twist and Shout (Isley Brothers via Top Notes)
  • Long Tall Sally (Little Richard)
  • Roll Over Beethoven (Chuck Berry)
  • Money (That’s What I Want) (Barrett Strong)
  • A Taste of Honey (Bobby Scott and Ric Marlow)
  • Till There Was You (Meredith Willson)

Context:

  • In their pre-1964 sets, cover songs sometimes made up more than half the setlist.
  • Even post-fame, The Beatles occasionally included covers in live performances—though by 1966, they were playing almost entirely original material (by Lennon-McCartney or Harrison).

Possible Implications from Sage of Quay:

Sage of Quay and similar commentators often cite the Beatles’ reliance on covers early on to suggest:

  1. The group wasn’t fully original until handlers shaped their image.
  2. Industry execs or Tavistock-type entities may have crafted the Beatles’ rise.
  3. The lack of raw live musicianship in later years casts doubt on the band’s consistency (especially post-1966).

4390c0c5 bdc2 4187 af95 f5b802884f08
Here’s a timeline chart showing the estimated decline in the percentage of cover songs The Beatles performed live from 1960 to 1966. Their early years were heavily reliant on covers, but by 1966, their sets were nearly 100% original compositions.

BELOW: Table showing representative Beatles cover songs performed live by year, along with estimated percentages of their setlists that included covers.

20250429 223536

BELOW: dual-line graph showing the estimated percentage of live cover songs by The Beatles and The Rolling Stones from 1960 through 1970. The Beatles phase out covers entirely by 1966 (when they stopped touring), while the Stones gradually shifted toward original material through the early ’70s.

Ad1913d8 3e39 4d9c b19d b33514bde7f2

20250429 223721

A1ca6be0 622c 44f4 b0da bc2fa1505a5a

BELOW: chart showing Beatles and Rolling Stones cover song percentages from 1960–1970, along with key musical milestones (top) and alleged occult/conspiratorial events (bottom, in red).

4a97399f ef4c 49c6 959a 9a7cee199f67

Enter Occultica

Exploring the theory that The Beatles and The Rolling Stones were products of a larger, occulted conspiracy involving institutions like the Tavistock Institute, figures such as Aleister Crowley, and programs like MK-Ultra, reveals a complex web of claims. Proponents suggest these bands were engineered to influence society, with elements like musical tuning and alleged replacements of band members serving as tools for control.


The Beatles & Rolling Stones: Parallel Timelines

Both bands emerged in the early 1960s, with The Beatles releasing “Please Please Me” in 1963 and The Rolling Stones debuting with “The Rolling Stones” in 1964. Their rapid success and global influence have led some to speculate about orchestrated efforts behind their rise.


Tavistock Institute & Social Engineering

The Tavistock Institute, established in 1947, specializes in the study of group behavior. Some theorists claim that it played a role in manipulating cultural trends, including the promotion of certain music acts, to steer public consciousness. (Tavistock Institute – Wikipedia)


Aleister Crowley & Occult Symbolism

Aleister Crowley, an English occultist, appears on the cover of The Beatles’ “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” album. His inclusion has fueled theories about the band’s connection to occult practices and symbolism. (Was The Beatles’ real-life Sgt. Pepper actually ‘the wickedest man in …)


MK-Ultra & Mind Control

Project MK-Ultra was a CIA program that experimented with mind control techniques during the Cold War. Some believe that elements of this program were applied to the music industry to influence public behavior and perception. (MK-Ultra – History.com, MKUltra – Wikipedia)


A440 vs. A432 Tuning

The standard tuning pitch of A=440 Hz is widely used today, but some argue that A=432 Hz is more harmonious with natural frequencies. The shift to A=440 Hz has been linked by some theorists to efforts aimed at disrupting natural harmony and influencing human consciousness. (Wacky Conspiracy About 440 Hz Tuning. : r/musictheory – Reddit)


Paul McCartney vs. “Faul” McCartney

The “Paul is Dead” theory posits that Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by a look-alike, often referred to as “Faul.” Proponents cite differences in appearance and behavior as evidence, suggesting a cover-up to maintain the band’s image and influence. (Faul McCartney is DEAD! – New conspiracy theory! – YouTube)


These theories intertwine music, psychology, and conspiracy, painting a picture of a potentially orchestrated cultural movement. While mainstream narratives attribute the success of these bands to talent and timing, alternative perspectives invite deeper scrutiny into the forces that shape popular culture.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjoIaJw_P_Q

33% On average, one out of every Three Beatles Live Performances was a Cover Tune

Transcript

Transcript – click to reveal
0:00
hello friends this is mike williams ophir zivi is back with us to present his analysis which looks into the songs
0:06
the beatles played live and to assess whether the live performances reflected the songs and hits from their first
0:14
seven albums and if not why not and so without further ado here's opher
0:22
well folks we have oprah zeeby is uh back with us today and uh we're
0:28
going to take a look at something that opher and i have discussed in the past in our discussions but we never actually
0:35
sat down and did a deeper dive and so what we're going to take a look at is the beatle albums their official
0:42
uk releases and the reason why we're going to focus on the uk albums is because they are the
0:50
official releases it's not the capital releases it's the uk albums that are recognized as the official
0:57
releases and we're going to do a comparison or i should say over has done a comparison
1:03
where he lays that up against the the beatles set list
1:08
when they played live between the period of 1962-1966
1:14
so that's the period we're going to focus on 62-66 because that's when the beatles
1:21
played live so if we take a look at the first slide this document compares the songs of the
1:26
beatles first seven uk studio album releases versus the reported set list
1:32
that the beatles performed on the day or close to the date when each album was released
1:39
and over sourced the set list from the website
1:44
setlist.fm it's a very good site and it's a very good source
1:50
and so the question as we go through this is going to be two questions one is does this analysis support the
1:57
official narrative which states that the beatles were geniuses and could do it all they could
2:03
write compose record and perform and when we talk about performing and i've spoken about this many times we're
2:09
talking about extensive live performance gigs
2:15
all right so that we have to keep that in mind it's very constant throughout the timeline up
2:20
through the 1965 period but especially 62 63 64.
2:27
the beatles were non-stop performing live the other question that we have is it's
2:33
the the opposite side of the coin or does what we're going to take you through
2:39
support the revised narrative and when we talk about the revised narrative of course it means that the
2:44
beatles were manufactured and handled and did not write and play
2:50
on their early period recordings and again we're focused on 1962 through 1966
2:57
and so as we go through this we're going to ask for you to decide we're not going to uh
3:05
decide for you we'll have our opinions of course but you can decide after taking a look at the analysis is there
3:12
anything you wanted to add over um hi mike um first thanks for having me on
3:17
your show again um it's always a pleasure and
3:23
um we sourced the website uh setlist.fm
3:29
which uh lists um the songs that the beatles played
3:36
on the live performances that many of the um shows
3:41
do not show uh the songs that were performed but
3:47
there are a lot of shows that we do get the set list as reported by a variety of
3:54
people who either well there or from other places and the reason we we know that this uh
4:02
source is i mean reasonable and and and true truthful
4:08
is because uh you can find on youtube some of the shows like the buddha khan that you discussed
4:15
the shows from shea stadium and from other places in america and we see that they they match the set
4:21
lists uh that appear in order on this website set list fam so we can
4:28
assume that this is a fairly uh you know reasonable and truthful uh
4:34
website and you will see as we take you through uh the slides
4:39
uh the information that we found there okay so
4:45
it's an accurate depiction of what they played on that given day
4:51
yeah and i just want to add one more comment the question between you and i and i'm
4:57
sure many of our listeners people who also have watched your uh presentations in the last few years
5:05
uh we can ask ourselves if they did come
5:10
write and compose all of their songs and with some practice there shouldn't have
5:17
been a problem playing them live on shows on live shows
5:24
but um as we'll go through the slides we'll see that this is not the case
5:30
uh there are all kinds of qualities and and things that
5:35
uh we take a deep dive into and [Music]
5:41
they really beg a lot of questions which we'll get there uh which we'll get to also in the end of
5:47
this presentation okay yeah great and like we said offer we're going to let the audience decide
5:53
so on the on the second slide this is something that i actually put together
Original compositions
5:59
and when i did the my big presentation did the beatles write all their own music
6:04
i focus on their official uk album releases and the songs
6:10
contained on the albums and they had 77 original compositions
6:18
on those seven albums please please me through revolver so in my big presentation
6:23
i did not focus on the singles that they released and many of the singles were not
6:30
on the albums although we had some cases where certain singles were but there are two singles that i did
6:37
cover in my big presentation because they were recorded during the rubber soul sessions and that was
6:43
we can work it out and daytripper so the number of songs
6:49
original compositions on the official uk releases again please please me through revolver is 77.
6:56
so then what i did was i went back and took a look at okay so how many singles were released
7:03
that were not on the albums and that number is 14 and you can see that the bottom right hand
7:09
side of the slide is a yellow bar and there's the 14 all the way to the right below that the green bar is the 77 songs
7:16
from the uh from the official uk albums and that totals to
7:22
91 songs original compositions between 1962
7:27
and 1966 i've mentioned the number of 90 i rounded it to 90 in a couple of
7:34
discussions and presentations that i did and the point that i had made was that
7:39
when i took a look at the total number of original songs between 62 and 66
7:46
and when i went through the setlist site and i was sampling
7:52
various performances i counted up around
7:57
25 original compositions that they played
8:03
over the timeline so it's 25 out of 91.
8:10
and so the question i asked and i i still ask is well
8:15
what happened to the other 65 songs how come they didn't play
8:20
any of those other 65 songs but would continue to play
8:25
cover songs throughout their performances in some cases they might play one cover in other
8:31
cases they played two or three but my point being is if they had this
8:37
portfolio of original compositions why would they continue to play cover
8:43
songs especially as they progressed through the timeline as they got into 1964 65 and 66 and so
8:52
on they could have went back to this very rich portfolio of songs that they had
8:58
recorded my answer to that has always been that's because they were taught songs
9:04
and they didn't actually write the songs and they didn't record the songs there were studio musicians that were
9:11
doing the uh laying down the tracks for the for the recorded versions of the songs on the albums and the singles
9:17
so the beatles had to learn the song so they were able to learn 25 of those
9:22
songs and that's why the number is 25 and not something greater
9:28
again laying it up against this number of 91 original compositions so again not to
9:34
repeat myself 65 songs just don't present themselves live and i
9:40
found that to be very interesting all right so with that that's kind of um the two setup slides and let's take a look
9:47
at the first slide over and from here on in i'll chime in here or there
Please Please Me
9:52
but i'm going to give you the floor and please please me is uh the first slide that uh you put
9:59
together so what did you find with uh with please please me we begin the um our journey
10:07
um which has seven stops and stopped for each album
10:12
and if you take a look at the chart here the table here on one side you have the
10:19
list of songs on the album on the uk release and on the other side you have the songs
10:27
that were performed live according to the information we get from the setlist dot fm um website
10:35
on either the same day here it's the same day my unexplained uh or a very close uh date to the uh release date of
10:44
the album so please please me was issued in the uk on march the 22nd
10:50
of 1963 um and we recall by the way that this is
10:56
like about a short um three or four weeks after the famous
11:02
february 11th where they recorded 11 songs in a nine hour session
11:09
which we discussed in the past and yeah i think it was 10 songs yeah 10 songs
11:14
found themselves on please please me with four additional songs that were released
11:20
on two singles previously so what you see on the on one side is the um
11:27
uh list of songs on the album please please me uh we
11:32
did uh mark songs which are covers and you can see
11:38
that on please please me we have six covers so out of 14 songs
11:45
six uh covers and then on the other side of the table on the same day
11:51
on march 22nd the middle appeared on the gomon theatre
11:57
in dunkster of england and they only performed six songs
12:02
love me do misery taste of honey which is a cover do you want to know a secret please please me and i saw her standing
12:08
there now what we can learn um here
12:14
is and by the way i checked also other dates on the same month on march
12:20
of 1963 and the the set lists are the same
12:25
so we see the same six songs this is what they performed it could be that on some shows they were
12:31
appearing with other people with other performers so they just you know appeared for a very brief
12:38
time with 20 minutes but this is what we have and so we have one cover which is a
12:46
taste of honey and five other uh original compositions now uh we learned that from memoirs
12:55
and other investigations which basically your work is that four early songs were written by
13:01
bill sheppard in the uh peppercorns group i saw her standing there i want to hold
13:07
your hand she loves you and please please me so two of them appear here
13:12
on this very very short set list so what we see is that they did one cover
13:21
they we know they did a lot of covers in the previous before they were signed when they
13:26
appeared in uh germany and liverpool and um five songs which are originals
13:35
okay now we have to remember that in um
13:40
the setlist.fm also calculated how many shows they did each year
13:46
and i want to mention this because this is important in 1960 they did 134
13:54
1961 246 1962 was like a record deal they did 391
14:03
shows but also in 1963 they did 339 shows
14:09
throughout the entire year this is an amazing number of shows
14:15
it's almost every day now we know that on some days they did double shows okay
14:22
but if you think that 339 of 339 performances
14:29
out of 365 days that's 1963. this is
14:35
i would say cruel uh schedule of shows i don't have any
14:40
other word to describe it day of the day after day of performing
14:46
and moving from theater to theater from city to city it's very very hectic it's very
14:52
difficult but this is what what we know so
14:57
here the beginning point we see that the album six covers out of 14 songs so six six covers and eight
15:05
originals and on the show on the set list they have just performed six songs five
15:12
originals and one cover um so we still cannot make up um
15:19
you know any any thing of importance but let's go on to
15:25
number two and we'll see how it progresses okay there's one thing i wanted to uh to comment on offer because
Bill Sheppard
15:31
because you mentioned it i just want to make sure we clarify what you meant by it so you said as per memoirs and
15:36
external investigations four of the early songs were written by bill shepard i saw her standing there i
15:43
want to hold your hand she loves you please please me now what we mean by that is there is a
15:49
passage in memoirs and it's it's written in a way that it's
15:54
coy i will admit that but it strongly alludes to
16:02
bill shepard or billy shears being involved in writing some of these early songs
16:08
and one of the points over that i have surmised and i think you have too is that at the very least
16:15
the songs were written by him and two they were recorded
16:20
possibly as demos for the beatles to learn from and one comment that you made
16:25
to me going back that was probably about a year ago you said to me that you could not find a
16:33
concrete date as to when the pepper pot's album was recorded and released do you
16:40
remember telling me that yes um i found a comment by someone on a
16:47
review review board that he says that he saw a copy of uh bell pepper on the pepperbot's
16:55
album from 1961 but we don't have a
17:00
you know any evidence of that unfortunately maybe now the albums that appear now and they
17:06
show on like a wikipedia and everything they say that the albums were released in 1964.
17:12
so we can only guess whether it was in order to hide the fact that these
17:19
songs were actually written way before the beatles recorded them
17:24
and in fact put on an album if this album really appeared in england at least in 1961 maybe 1962
17:32
but the only source we have so far is memoirs which states that uh it talks about i
17:38
think on i want to hold your hand yeah yeah so so if if memoirs is is correct
17:44
and as i mentioned it does lead us down that path then it says that billy
17:50
was involved in the beatles in the whole project the initiative the psyop whatever you want
17:56
to call it early on it was way before 1966 is the point okay so
18:04
we'll let the the audience decide which way they want to go with this somebody could say well
18:10
it was released in 1964 and so on but you know we're talking about deep state
18:16
activities folks this is a point i make all the time they put out information and data that
18:22
they want to put out it's as simple as that they can make any record they want to make and when i say
18:28
a record i mean documentation giving us dates as to when things were released or published and so on i mean
18:33
they create that information so they can lead you to believe whatever it is that they want you
18:39
to believe okay so all i'm saying is and and offer saying is to keep an open mind that it's
18:44
possible it's very possible that the the pepper pots and the the recording of these songs
18:52
were done prior to the beatles coming on board with emi and that george martin
18:58
had tapped billy to write these songs to record them to be
19:04
used as demos so the beatles can learn them okay so it is a premise
With the Beatles
19:10
okay so the next slide is with the beatles which is their second uk release
19:15
and we see here on the right hand side i don't want to uh steal your thunder but there's a lot of covers
19:22
that wind up being played live but let's let's just start with uh where you want to start with this slide
19:28
so the second album the comparison again is on the same date and by the way it's a
19:33
very famous date in the american history of course november 22nd of 1963 the kennedy
19:39
assassination but this is not the point of our discussion today
19:44
um on this date uh in the uk we saw the release of with the beatles
19:50
the second album again 14 songs on the record and six of them are covers
19:56
so although 1963 was the breakup year of the beatles in the uk
20:02
and this album came towards the end of 1963 we still see that
20:08
in terms of material on the album 14 songs eight new or eight originals
20:15
and six covers so we still have a lot of covers and if you look at the other side of the
20:22
table you see the set list now we see 10 songs five originals and five covers
20:31
now i made some comments here from me to you and she loves you were released as singles in 1963
20:38
but they do not appear on any of any one of the first two albums now
20:44
in 1963 i want to hold your hand was a huge uk number one five weeks at number one
20:51
also released as a single but we don't see it on the set list
20:56
uh the song was recorded on october october 17th a month before the release of with the beatles and before the show
21:04
and in fact it was released on october 29th but they still did not play it live then
21:10
i found this to be a little strange uh this huge hit does not show
21:16
on setlist previous to november 22nd 1963 or afterwards
21:21
so this is interesting because we know that when a band issues a single
21:27
uh in order to promote it and if they wrote it and composed it
21:34
and with some practice there shouldn't be a problem performing it and yet on the set list we see
21:40
five originals five covers and no i want to hold your hand okay and this runs also
21:47
on the dates uh the performance dates after november 22 the 22nd
21:53
so this i found to be very strange now the other thing i found very interesting with the set list is
21:59
when we take a look at the cover so that's where we have the the little the finger pointing to the songs
22:05
of all the songs from with the beatles the current album the only original
22:11
is all my loving which is the third song showing on the set list on the right
22:16
hand side of the table all of the other songs from with the beatles are cover tunes
22:22
so that begs the question why did they not play more of the original music
22:30
from with the beatles what it says to me is the reason why that happened is because they had not learned
22:37
the original songs from with the beatles now with the beatles was one of those situations
22:43
where if i remember my numbers and my days correctly they recorded all of the songs
22:49
i think it was two sessions within a seven day period of time so it was non-contiguous which means they came
22:56
in they recorded the album we're told they recorded the album then there was a break they came in for a second session
23:03
and they finished recording the rest of the album or the songs on the album okay so again we have one of these situations
23:10
where we have a very very compressed timeline this is a problem that we see throughout the beatle timeline
23:17
very very compressed periods of time as to when they're in the studio and supposedly recording these songs
23:24
but along with not playing i want to hold your hand which you're absolutely correct that should have been on a set
23:29
list you would think they played only one original from with the beatles and everything else that was
23:35
on the with the beatles album that they played on the set list were cover tunes very odd and also i found
23:42
i found it interesting that please please me was not performed please excuse me was actually
23:49
the second single after love me do love we do got to number 17 by the end of 1962 but please please we
23:56
got to number two uh on the official uk chart and it was really the breakout hit in
24:03
england in 1963. so five covers on the set list and no i
24:10
want to hold your hand the new single and now please please me which is was
24:17
also a huge hit in the uk so that's the story of the end of 1963 okay so we're seeing
24:26
again folks we've been through two albums and uh with the release of with the
24:31
beatles we're seeing a lot of cover music being played and songs that should
24:36
have been played because of their popularity not showing up on the set list so
24:43
again we'll let you decide uh should we go to a hard day's night over yeah
Soundtrack to Hardest Night
24:48
so album number three uh that's the soundtrack to hardest night it was released on july the 10th
24:56
of 1964 in the uk what we see is again
25:01
um seven songs on side a six songs on side b
25:07
and the royal original and then if you switch to the um the other side of the chart we see i
25:14
chose the show uh which was on july 17th so that's like a week after the the album was in the
25:21
stores they appeared on the paris theater in london
25:26
on that evening and they only played eight songs now i must say that this setlist is very
25:33
sketchy looks very sketchy to me uh i checked that with other dates on
25:38
this um the month of july 1964 and we also get partial set lists but this is
25:45
most probably what they performed on stage five out of the eight songs are from a holidays night
25:51
which is accepted the other three songs all four if you count the kansas medley
25:58
uh you see song number seven it's kansas city and hey hey hey that's a cover so three five originals and three covers
26:06
now can't buy me love the huge number one in the uk 1964 and from this album
26:13
does not appear on the set list so instead of playing the number one hit which also features on the new album
26:20
they played against several covers again very strange also the the big 19
26:27
1963 hits do not appear on this 1964 set list so again major hits from just a year
26:34
before do not feature on the live sets covers yes but not the big hits from the the broken
26:41
to the uk public so again this is a kind of strange situation
26:47
i just said one more comment in 1964 they also performed a lot
26:52
according to setlist.fm they had 232 shows
26:57
in 1964 alone so that's also a lot might they want to add anything no you
27:04
mentioned uh three covers with the live show but there were two right we had long tall sally and kansas city yeah he
27:10
counted if you count hey hey hey it's part of the kansas city gotcha continuing so this is interesting too
27:16
because um you you mentioned can't buy me love is not on the set list
27:22
yeah and there were other songs that like you said uh hits from please please me as an example that
27:30
didn't make the setlist yet they're doing long tall sally and kansas city
27:36
and somebody might argue well you know they're they're good rockers and you know so it picks up the crowd the
27:43
fun songs to play and all that stuff but in my mind that conflicts with the story that we're told
27:49
about the beatles where they're genius songwriters and they wrote all these brilliant songs and so why would you not
27:55
play those brilliant songs why would you continue to bring covers in so they've got uh we're told 13 original
28:04
songs from a hard day's night and they've got two covers in a set list
28:10
they couldn't pick two more songs from a hard day's night originals or some of the hits that over has mentioned
28:17
instead of the covers or two more original songs from their first album please please me you know so again
28:24
i agree with you all for this is this is very sketchy and the fact that it's only eight songs just eight songs
28:31
doesn't seem right either it seems like it should be more songs most of their sets as they went through time were
28:38
uh had to do with the number 11. did you want to go to uh the next album beatles for sale yeah okay let's go there
Beatles For Sale
28:46
so jump to december 4th of 1964.
28:51
uh this was the christmas album beatles for sale album number four and we see
29:00
again 14 songs and we still see covers i mean this uh this
29:06
is the fourth album by the beatles and they already have many hits but still
29:12
some of the songs i count here i think five on the album are covers
29:18
and again this is very interesting now if we switch to the other side we
29:24
see that i picked the the december 24th uh
29:29
1964 that's the day before christmas eve i think they appeared on the hammersmith audio
29:35
in london which is a famous theater in london and if we check the set list we see 11
29:41
songs and again one two three
29:47
four five covers so eleven songs on the set list and five of them are covers
29:52
and we're talking about the beatles by the end of 1964 after two years four albums and many hits already in the
30:00
charts and in the fans hearts and half of this show is covers
30:07
this is very strange yeah so my comments here is also i want to add
30:12
i feel fine was released also as the 1964 christmas single and became a huge number one
30:19
it is not on the album but we see that it is featured on the set list
30:26
okay that's i feel fine five of the eleven songs on the set list were covers one is that
30:32
and only three setlist songs uh here were number ones so can't buy me love
30:39
hard is night and i feel fine they did not play the other three number one so far i want to hold your hand she loves
30:45
you and for me to you also not feature this place please me so we see again
30:50
five covers out of 11 songs instead of hits big hits for the beatles
30:57
so again this is a very you know peculiar set list yeah and
31:03
we see on beatles for sale this is when i'll follow the sun appears on an album and
31:10
the official narrative tells us that uh that song allegedly
31:15
goes back to i believe it was 1960 and we're told that
31:21
that's when uh paul mccartney wrote that song and
31:26
then four years later it ends up on beatles for sale now i've i've
31:32
questioned that whole narrative i don't believe i'll follow the sun was uh written in 1960
31:38
there's a lot of content that's put out there that is put out there to
31:44
mislead and to uh to support the official narrative but here we have i'll follow
31:50
the sun and what's interesting to me is the reason why i'm talking about this is if the song was written back in 1960
31:56
that means it's a a well played well well-rehearsed song it's now on the album
32:02
and it does not appear on the set list so i would think that i'll follow the
32:07
sun which is a very good song in my opinion should have been on the set list given
32:12
its history i want to add another thing we see two songs on the set list which will return in
32:21
uh later uh set lists and we'll get to them if you see song number three babies and
32:28
uh babies in black and song number eight i'm i'm looking at the set list she's a
32:33
woman now these are by no means important songs
32:39
out of the 250 songs that the beatles recorded and i'm saying i'm not saying they're
32:45
not good songs i'm not saying and you know people like them but they're not important i
32:51
mean it's not elena rigby or yesterday or you know they're not there
32:56
and we still see that these two songs out of a very short set list
33:02
appear and reappear you'll see them in the next slides also so it could be that these two songs were
33:08
songs that the beatles were you know felt comfortable playing or maybe there's another reason but
33:14
to me although we're talking about two original compositions these are songs that we
33:20
that you know i wouldn't choose for a set list yeah especially
33:26
babies in black which i my personal opinion is it's not one of their stronger songs yeah in fact
33:33
beatles for sale is considered probably one of their weakest albums that was released during the 62 through
33:39
66 period so um yeah that's a very good point offer why do those songs come back
33:46
yeah should we go to help yeah okay all right so we jump to 1965 to august
Help
33:56
um just one comment before we go over the the chart here in 1965 we see a reduction in the number
34:04
of shows they did only 85 shows so that's a major reduction
34:10
uh of course they did uh the movie help and they had other activities but uh it
34:15
seems that you know the craziness of appearing like day after day after day
34:21
has you know disappeared that's uh that's what we see um so number five help
34:28
was released on the uk in the uk on august 13th of 1965
34:34
we see that it has 14 songs and again two covers on the album on side b
34:42
act naturally and this is misleading so this is album number five
34:48
and we still we still see two covers on the beatles album uh which to me seemed like
34:55
fillers in a way but uh that's just my opinion if we jump to the live show
35:03
so a day after release on the uk in the uk they were in new york at shea stadium
35:10
that's august 15th excuse me two days after that and this is what they played we get the
35:15
twelve song setlist eight originals and four covers
35:21
and you can see the covers marked also interesting they played 12 songs
35:26
live instead of the usual 11 and uh they played the last five uk
35:32
number ones including the current single the number one song help but this set list again it's like a
35:39
mishmash of covers songs which are not like the top hits or
35:45
the you know important songs by the beatles but five hits
35:50
well just that yesterday is not on the set list that's amazing yeah you're right
35:56
and now folks we are five albums in and
36:01
the set list contains four covers in my opinion there should be no covers
36:07
because again we have to put it into the context of of the beatles official narrative brilliant prolific genius
36:13
songwriters that set list of 12 songs in my opinion should be 12
36:19
original compositions sourced from the five albums that they have released yet like opher
36:26
says 12 song set list four covers and they didn't play yesterday so
36:32
i don't know again it seems very off to me should we move to rubber soul yeah
36:37
okay let's move to rubisol now let's take a look at what's going on there okay album number six the release date
36:44
in the uk was december 3rd of 1965 so obviously
36:50
ready for uh the christmas shoppers and also on the set list which is they
36:56
appeared on um december 3rd of 1965 they did two shows on that day
37:02
they appeared in the odeon theater in glasgow of scotland and they did 11
37:08
songs with only one cover which is act act naturally now day tripper and we can work it out were
37:16
issued as a double a side single and we're not on the album but they are
37:22
they have been they the villagers did perform them as we can see on the set list also we see that they
37:29
still perform songs which were not among the greatest hits and again we see babies in black and she
37:35
is a woman so in an eleventh song set they take the place these two songs take
37:40
the place of much bigger uh songs or hits so this is again uh rather odd to me
37:47
yeah and now we do see yesterday being played live but this is some time
37:52
down the line now when i would say that paul mccartney
37:58
learned the song so it took a period of time for him to learn the song to be able to play live if it wasn't studio
38:06
players behind the scene or playing to a backing track which i've discussed this before that was
38:12
taking place but we'll give them the benefit of the doubt here and say that uh we were playing um this stuff live
38:19
okay just for the sake of argument but you're right offer i mean i considering now that we have six albums
38:26
uh under their belt that's that set list of 11 songs is is not i mean it's not stellar i agree like
38:34
why babies in black is still being played is beyond me uh is there anything else you wanted to talk about no i think
38:41
we can move to the final the seventh album of this time period 1962-1966
38:48
revolver yeah revolver just one comment in 1966 we see
Revolver
38:54
that the show shows count was reduced to only
38:59
and of course um august the 29th was the last show so
39:05
in eight months they only appeared 35 times so we see a major reduction in live shows
39:12
in those first eight months of 1966. let's take a look at the um chart here
39:19
album seven revolver we have 14 brand new songs okay so the album was
39:27
released on august 5th of 1966 so the album
39:33
and the single double eyesight single which is elena rugby and yellow submarine
39:38
are in the stores or in the music shops okay so august 5th
39:45
the album revolver is in the album section of every music store in america
39:50
and if you go to the you will you will go to enter a store a music store and go to the signal section
39:57
you would find elena rigby and yellow submarine as a double a site single
40:03
now we jump only a week later to the first show
40:08
from the final tour ever and there in america of course
40:14
the first show was in the international amphitheater that's in chicago
40:21
on august 12th and take a look at the set list eleven swans two covers nine originals
40:28
and the single elenoric the yellow submarine was not performed live thus strangely
40:34
receiving no promotion from the band we see the return of i wanna be your man
40:39
of all songs being performed they did perform the big summer number one single paperback writer
40:46
which is not a revolver by the way the promotional clickful paperwork writer is the last time we see biopol alive that
40:54
is on a beatles film clip so this is uh i know we talked about it
41:00
in the past a week after a new double a site single and a major
41:06
album is released we don't see elena rigby or yellow submarine or
41:12
taxman as you have mentioned on the set list but we get two covers
41:18
we get she is a woman and babies in black again we get i want to be a man
41:24
which was a hit for the rolling stones but the beatles perform it here so again a very strange set list
41:32
on a major tour yeah this is very telling oh for you and i have discussed
41:38
this before there's not one song from revolver that made it into the
41:43
set list after revolver was released and of course
41:48
revolver is considered by many beatles fans and uh rock music
41:54
critics to be one of the greatest albums rock albums of all time and not one song from revolver made it onto the set list
42:01
now some people will want to argue well the songs got more sophisticated and it was difficult to
42:08
replicate them in a live setting and all that stuff as far as i'm concerned that's just
42:13
that's just excuses and rationalization because there are ways to present the songs live
42:20
you could do acoustic versions of them you can do uh edited versions of them
42:25
to bring that to the audience i think not doing them is very strange so you would figure some
42:32
way out to get those songs played in a live setting and it just didn't happen
42:38
and again two covers rock and roll music aren't we tired of that by now
42:43
long tall sally the same thing babies in black i want to be your man
42:50
i don't know it doesn't resonate with me offer yeah one would assume that let's say they did that leonardo mccartney did
42:57
write all of the songs so relatively close to the recording and
43:02
then the issuing of the album so with some practice they could have done it they could have
43:08
performed absolutely they are the beatles i mean the biggest man in the world and we see
43:14
this uh set list and by the way there are videos you can catch on youtube
43:20
from this american tour and these are the songs and in this order i did catch a couple of uh
43:28
at least a couple of them this is a revolver which concludes this uh very
43:34
interesting time period in the beatles history yeah and so some folks who might be new to uh to the research might be
43:41
asking well why didn't they play something from revolver well it goes back to the
43:47
analysis i did with rubber soul in my big presentation did the beatles write all the wrong music which stated that
43:53
the beatles weren't writing the music the music was written for them and they weren't on the recorded tracks on
44:00
the albums and the singles that was all done by studio musicians i called the wrecking crew model
44:06
and the songs that the beatles did play live they were taught those songs they had to learn those songs and
44:12
rehearse them and then they would take them out on the road so clearly what happened in the case of revolver is they
What happened with Revolver
44:19
didn't have time to learn those songs and practice them and rehearse them to take them out on the road and that's why
44:27
there were no songs from evolver on the tour that followed the release of the album because the beatles didn't
44:33
know how to play those songs they weren't taught those songs and they didn't
44:38
learn and rehearse them okay so if you're just new to uh to the work here that's my
44:45
position oh for i i don't want to speak on your behalf but what's your take yeah
44:50
this is uh again you have to remember the mo this is the most popular band in
44:56
the world and lennon and mccartney are hailed as the greatest
45:02
and many beatles fans consider them to be geniuses
45:08
so then we see the setlists with uh many covers and and they i think
45:15
that they were very proficient in doing covers because this is what they did before they got uh the recording session
45:22
yeah the recording contract sorry they were very proficient and also they played
Live gigs
45:28
we know that they played six seven eight hours a night and i think in 1916 1961
45:34
but mostly covers that's what that's what we know so maybe they felt more comfortable doing
45:40
covers but again after seven albums with major songs major hits we get these set
45:47
lists which uh raise a lot of questions yeah and and you touch on a very
45:53
important point here so all of the live gigs and performances that they were doing between 1960 and
45:59
1963 that was done in order to
46:04
increase the beatles performance skills they were performers so that was part of their their
46:10
programming if you will their conditioning to take the psychological
46:16
operation known as beetlemania and take it out on the road
46:21
in support of this narrative which says that as opher mentioned
46:26
we have these prolific genius songwriters and here are their songs
46:32
so that's what the beatles were doing they were being worked
46:37
in order to be more proficient in learning songs and then performing them and taking them out
46:44
live that's why they had this non-stop extensive
46:50
gigging that started back in 1960 when they went to hamburg back in august of 1960
46:58
right through the end of 1963. and if you don't believe us what i'll do is i'll put the link down below
47:04
in wikipedia they have a whole list of all of their live gigs going back to
47:10
1960 and they were playing virtually every day and as ofer mentioned when they were in
47:17
hamburg their stints were seven to eight hours
47:23
a night so they got to the hamburg club at 6 00 p.m and this is per peak best by
47:29
the way and i'll put that interview down in the description box as well and they didn't leave
47:36
the venue the club until 2 a.m and then in that interview that pete did he said that
47:42
by the time they woke up after seven or eight hours of playing
47:48
it was 3 p.m in the afternoon and then they had to be back at the club
47:54
at 6 00 p.m so that left a three-hour window of time in which they did you
48:00
know i guess they ate right had to wake up you know uh and then get themselves over to the
48:06
club by 6 p.m you know so there was no songwriting taking place in hamburg
48:11
absolutely not you know anybody who continues to try to believe that they were writing songs you know in
48:17
their sleep on the back of napkins uh all this stuff it's it's just
48:23
nonsense it's it's a nonsense narrative often should we move to your uh summary
48:28
conclusions and thoughts yeah just to summarize
Summary
48:34
we ask ourselves when did they have time to write songs so we know that the beatles were touring
48:39
heavily between 1960 and 1966 they had performed
48:45
1461 times again this this number is according to the setlist.fm
48:52
website um many mainly in the uk and germany
48:58
when any of the first seven albums were issued in the uk they were either in the middle of touring or beginning to tour
49:05
that raises the question again of when did they have time to write all of their songs that's one thing
49:12
also there are very short breaks between recording an album and beginning or continuing to tour
49:19
this is very unusual but i guess this these were the builds lives
49:24
throughout this time period this is very unusual because in many cases bands record an album then start
49:32
rehearsing for a tour and only then tour this is not the case with the beatles
49:37
since their hectic live dates are too many it seems they did not have time to
49:42
rehearse prepare for touring and no time to write songs now these are
49:49
i guess mike and mike's and my conclusions
49:54
but i'm sure that people are watching this can write all comments
50:01
and let us know if they agree with us or not and again this presentation is not
50:08
built on memoirs this is simply a comparison between albums
50:13
and performances and i know that there are many music musicians money who follow your work
50:20
but even if you know a listener is not a musician only music music fan
50:25
i think that this um this tour this does raises several
50:30
questions which i mean this is what we're trying to to conclude with yeah so as i've mentioned
50:36
many times over what i do many times and i know what you do is we take existing
50:42
information existing data that's contained within the official narrative and then we
50:48
take it apart we do a deeper dive we analyze it does it make sense
50:54
so as offer mentioned all this information that's been presented it's out there
50:59
it's it's not hidden it's information that's there as an example they performed 1461 times
51:07
that's an incredible amount of live performances when i did the um
51:12
rubber soul analysis in my from my big presentation did the beatles write all the wrong music going back to what alpha
51:18
said they were on their american tour they did 16 cities and 16 days i think it was over yeah something like that i
51:25
mean right so they were doing a city a day so they would they would perform they get on an airplane or a bus or
51:31
whatever they get to the next city this was in the u.s right i think they did one stop in in canada if i recall and
51:37
then they had a six-week break and then they went into the rubber soul sessions on october 11th 1965 and the official
51:44
narrative tells us that when they came into those sessions they had no backlog of music they wrote
51:51
rehearsed arranged recorded mixed 16 songs 14 for
51:57
the album and two songs for the single we can work it out in daytripper in 30 days and my
52:03
contention is that was not possible so um again like i said if you take the
52:09
official story and you stop taking it at face value and you start to examine it what happens
52:16
is it's like pulling the thread on a sleeve on a sweater it eventually just comes apart and this is what i have
52:23
found offered i know you as well when we take a closer look at this thing you know things start to
52:29
not make sense and the story begins to collapse right yeah okay so let's take a
52:34
look at the last slide here and uh let's take us through this over yeah so we did
Analysis
52:39
i did a summary chart just to show
52:45
the percentage of covers out of
52:51
total songs on an album and then on a show and um if this runs too fast you can of
52:58
course uh you can stop the video and just take a look at each other's too many numbers here
53:05
but basically the um the idea is like this i mean
53:10
why did we get so many covers and albums on live shows so this is a summary of covers
53:18
the beatles record them on albums and performed on the live shows the table basically
53:25
summarizes the seven albums and shows like we have covered in the beginning of uh
53:31
in throughout this uh presentation so if you take a look at the chart you
53:36
get the numbering on one through seven on the left side
53:42
we start with the total song of an album this is the second column
53:49
covers in that album for example album number one there was his six covers out of 14 songs that
53:56
amounts to 43 percent of non-original compositions
54:03
and then if you follow it um there's the number of songs performed on
54:08
the live show as we've seen on the show close to the release of the first
54:15
album they only performed six songs one of which was a cover
54:20
now i don't want to go through all the numbers but let's jump to the bottom of this table and show
54:26
show like the the bottom line numbers so we have 97 songs
54:32
on the entire first seven albums look at the very last row
54:39
um 20 of them were covers which is uh 24.1
54:46
and on the live shows they had 69 songs 20 of which were
54:51
covers which amounts to 29 which is almost a third
54:56
so a third of all of the biggest songs performed live were covers okay so this
55:02
is a very telling number in my opinion maybe some other band it might not be a bad number yeah but
55:08
for a band that had at that time by the time we got to 1966
55:15
had 91 original compositions when we add in the 77 original compositions from the
55:21
albums and then uh 14 singles original compositions that were
55:26
not on the albums that's 77 plus 14 is 91 and almost 30 percent of the songs that
55:33
they played live or covers that doesn't make any sense to me at all like i said especially when we put it
55:40
into the context of who the beatles were and are at least
55:45
what we're told yeah so um [Music]
55:51
i'm continuing to read the second bullet here which is you know just like what you said 29
55:58
almost a third of the performed sponsored by the wheels of covers
56:04
and what um
56:10
the reliance on doing so many couples lives begs several questions
56:16
so if lemon and mccartney wrote so many original songs where are they and you mentioned at the beginning of this
56:21
presentation that 65 out of 90 or 91 songs
56:27
will never play live right that's a lot
56:32
and then we can ask ourselves why
56:38
did they not test them live or why not test more songs live instead of doing covers
56:45
which we know many bands do right why did they choose on some occasions to play covers instead
56:51
of performing some of those songs which were the biggest hits at that moment or in that year
57:00
and or even or even in previous years i mean going back right why didn't they play some of the big hits from the
57:05
beginning i mean fans would want to hear that yes
57:11
now since the early days they did mostly covers did he take off uh some pressure off of
57:17
them when performing live i mean did they found find it easier to play covers
57:24
which they knew probably from the hamburg and liverpool early days
57:29
did they feel more confident doing covers at least for a portion of every concert instead of doing new music
57:36
that's also something we have to think about or and this is something mike you touched
57:42
upon on several of your more recent presentations was there a logistical issue or
57:48
consideration as well if they were helped by backstage musicians
57:53
was that the reason why they did so many couples live we don't know we can only
58:01
think and discuss what we see
58:06
yeah so i think what happened over again my opinion is that um
58:11
it took time for them to learn the quote original songs
58:17
so george martin had them sitting in a studio and they had to be shown these songs
58:26
how to play them what was the melody line so when you think about it they had to be taught the guitar chords they had
58:32
to be taught the different riffs the lead guitar
58:38
the bass uh ringo how to learn the drumming so the point i'm making is that this is
58:44
not something that they just did in a couple of hours so they you know the process of learning
58:49
these songs took time and then once they were taught the songs and they studied their parts then they
58:57
had to rehearse them all of that takes time
59:03
and so they were only able to learn a certain amount of songs within a certain
59:08
period of time and that's why
59:13
they had to fall back on covers because they already knew those there was no learning involved with long
59:19
tall sally in kansas city and songs like that but the learning of the quote original
59:26
compositions was a process it's not just something you whip off and
59:31
you bang through and yep got it that didn't happen that did not happen
59:37
so that's why i believe we see all the covers because it just took a long time for them to learn the original stuff
59:44
and i use the term original loosely yeah [Laughter]
59:50
so this is uh an excellent piece of work over as usual
59:56
and again you know we we gave our opinion everybody knows where i stand on this stuff so
1:00:01
you know but uh but offer and i are in sync because we've had discussions on this stuff but
1:00:07
we're going to leave it to you you decide we're presenting information we're presenting data we're presenting
1:00:14
our research and our analysis that's what we're doing and if it resonates with you
1:00:19
great if it doesn't resonate with you that's okay too like i've always said people think i'm
1:00:26
always trying to convince people i'm not trying to convince anybody of anything
1:00:32
people will come to their own conclusions based upon what it is
1:00:37
they want to believe and whether they change their position
1:00:43
on something um that's completely up to them you can you cannot convince
1:00:48
somebody of something before they are willing to listen
1:00:53
and to open their minds to a different perspective
1:00:59
so that's why i don't waste my time doing that so over any closing
1:01:06
yeah i just want to state maybe like
1:01:12
a half a sentence from the uh any of the last two versions of memoirs
1:01:19
well we learned that uh george martin basically
1:01:25
cut the pills into the studio to use their voices that's a line i
1:01:31
vividly remember from memoirs
1:01:37
and that's like a huge clue for us well there are other clues of course and
1:01:43
other other statements in memoirs but when we compare
1:01:50
the quality or the quantity and the quality of songs on their albums first seven
1:01:55
albums there are many great songs but
1:02:01
we can conclude i guess again this is my
1:02:07
my conclusion and i know yours too that they did not write
1:02:13
or compose or even play on many of the songs in
1:02:19
that time period and most probably in the second period after
1:02:24
1966 and but again this is something it will be
1:02:30
very interesting to see in the comments to this presentation
1:02:36
and again mike i wanted to thank you uh for inviting me
1:02:42
and uh we'll continue to follow this story and see what what happens
1:02:47
yeah any time offer you know that you have an open invite your work is excellent i do want to say
1:02:54
it's not just memoirs that that tells us that uh george martin like their voices we hear that from george martin himself
1:03:00
at interview clips i really like their voices and they had charisma how many times
1:03:06
have we heard that they had charisma and he liked their voices so uh
1:03:11
again um a lot of this work folks uh before we conclude here
1:03:17
is outside of memoirs you know so memoirs was essentially
1:03:24
foundational it was a stepping stone that got me curious it got over curious and
1:03:30
other researchers and colleagues of ours and
1:03:36
we've gone outside of memoirs because that's what memoirs does memoirs is actually
1:03:42
asking you to step outside the book and to research
1:03:47
beyond the book because it would be impossible to
1:03:53
contain everything in one book it wouldn't be 666 pages it would be 66 666 pages so it had to cover
1:04:01
everything so that's the thing it gets uh if you're intrepid enough it gets your
1:04:07
interest peaked and you start poking around and taking a look at things before you know it you have presentations like this
1:04:15
so well offer again i really appreciate you coming on and anytime you have
1:04:22
any analysis or research you want to present just let me know and uh we'll get it out there i really appreciate the time and effort
1:04:30
you put into this presentation thank you so much okay all right with that folks we'll wrap up
1:04:36
the comment section is open let us know what you think and we will talk soon have a great day
1:04:43
[Music] [Applause] [Music]
1:04:49
[Applause] [Music] [Applause]
1:04:56
[Music]
1:05:19
when you're gonna get it all those years
1:05:27
sing it alone [Applause]
1:05:33
[Music] when you're gonna get it
1:05:40
talking to me [Music]
1:06:01
when you're gonna get it all those years
1:06:07
[Music]
1:06:13
when you're gonna get it when you're gonna get it
1:06:23
[Music]
1:06:51
[Applause] [Music]
1:07:12
gotta be [Music]
1:07:24
when you're gonna get it
1:07:34
[Applause] [Music]
1:07:41
when you're gonna get it [Applause]
1:07:47
[Music] [Applause] [Music]
1:08:02
you

The Beatles, Occult Control, and the Manufactured British Invasion: A Deep Dive into Cultural Engineering

Key Findings

  • The Beatles performed a disproportionately high number of cover songs during their early public performances, despite being credited with hundreds of original compositions.
  • A comparative timeline shows that both The Beatles and The Rolling Stones emerged and peaked under similar timelines, allegedly under shared control by intelligence-linked psychological institutions like the Tavistock Institute.
  • Allegations persist that Paul McCartney was replaced in 1966 by “Faul” McCartney, a doppelganger with different biometrics and behavior, supported by body language and forensic photography.
  • Aleister Crowley, Thelema, and other esoteric occult symbols are embedded in album art (notably Sgt. Pepper’s), lyrics, and public personas.
  • Epstein and other handlers tied to intelligence, MI6, and suspected mind control programs (MK-ULTRA), played critical roles in grooming and advancing both The Beatles and Rolling Stones.
  • Music industry figures such as Theodor Adorno are speculated to have ghostwritten or influenced material used to shape social narratives.
  • The A440Hz tuning standard, promoted by Rockefeller-linked entities, replaced A432Hz—the so-called natural resonance frequency—just prior to the Beatles’ commercial ascent.

I. Early Setlists vs. Claimed Original Output
It is curious that a band credited with pioneering pop songwriting would lean so heavily on covers—many of which were African-American R&B standards. During 1960-1963, Beatles setlists often included upwards of 50% cover material. This persisted even as the Lennon-McCartney catalog expanded. Such choices suggest either a lack of early songwriting confidence or industry orchestration to root the Beatles in already-established musical archetypes.

II. Parallel Trajectories: Beatles vs. Stones
The Beatles (EMI/Parlophone) and The Rolling Stones (Decca) both burst onto the global scene in the early 1960s. Their rivalry, stylized as clean-cut vs. rebellious, mirrors classic psychological dialectic control. Both were heavily guided by managers with suspicious backgrounds—Brian Epstein for The Beatles, and Andrew Loog Oldham for the Stones, both with intelligence-adjacent connections.

A quick release comparison:

  • Beatles first album: Please Please Me (1963)
  • Rolling Stones first album: The Rolling Stones (1964)
  • Beatles final live concert: 1966
  • Stones take over mass popularity by 1967

Both bands were present at or involved with events linked to broader cultural manipulation, including the 1967 “Summer of Love.”

III. Tavistock, MI6, and the Cultural Control Matrix
The Tavistock Institute for Human Relations is often cited as the nerve center for British social engineering. It allegedly worked with British Intelligence and American counterparts (CIA, OSS) to test societal conditioning methods through pop culture. Beatles and Stones output—musically and visually—aligned with radical shifts in drug use, sexual norms, and political dissidence.

Figures like Theodor Adorno, with Frankfurt School and intelligence ties, have been alleged to have composed Beatles material as part of psychological operations. This view holds that culture was weaponized via pop music to dismantle traditional values.

IV. The Occult and The Beatles
Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967) features Aleister Crowley on its cover, along with other esoteric figures. The Beatles’ shift to psychedelic music coincided with public experimentation with LSD (MK-ULTRA overlap). Crowley’s maxim, “Do What Thou Wilt,” became a countercultural mantra—one mirrored in Beatles lyrics and ideology.

The band’s connections to Indian mysticism (Maharishi Mahesh Yogi), backward masking, and symbolic lyrics suggest deliberate programming with occult undertones. Lennon’s statements about being “more popular than Jesus” and his later assassination add further mystery.

V. Paul is Dead: The “Faul” McCartney Theory
A persistent theory alleges that Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by a lookalike, “Faul.” Proponents cite height differences, facial shape, and musical changes post-1966. Forensic photographic analysis and voiceprint studies are offered as supporting evidence. Sage of Quay and others point to clues in lyrics, reverse audio, and album art (Abbey Road funeral procession imagery).

This theory intersects with Tavistock interests: was the replacement a test of mass suggestibility?

VI. Musical Tuning: A440 vs. A432
A440Hz, the current global tuning standard, was promoted by the Rockefeller Foundation and codified by ISO in 1955. Critics argue this frequency is dissonant to human biology and natural Earth resonance. A432Hz, tied to sacred geometry and natural harmonics, is said to be more spiritually aligned. The Beatles’ early work straddles this transition, with some suggesting they were used to normalize A440 to mass audiences.

VII. Epstein, Martin, and Hidden Agendas
Brian Epstein, son of a prominent Jewish merchant family, had access to elite social circles and intelligence-linked networks. His sudden death (allegedly suicide) and controlling role over The Beatles’ public image raise red flags. George Martin, classically trained and with BBC ties, played the role of musical architect—arguably guiding the Beatles more than publicly admitted.

VIII. Conclusions

  • The Beatles were likely a controlled cultural project.
  • Occult symbols and psychological manipulation are embedded in their music, marketing, and evolution.
  • The “Paul is Dead” theory may represent a broader test of public malleability.
  • Standardized tuning (A440) may have been part of an effort to desynchronize human resonance.
  • The overlapping rise of Beatles and Stones appears coordinated, not organic.

Bibliography

Every Third Bealtes Song Performed Live was a Cover Tune - Faul iz ded

Leave a Comment

Please disable your adblocker or whitelist this site!