in history, the winner tells a different tale than the truth
no one given or allowed power who has sold their own or taken another’s freedom
no interracial marriage, no inter-tribal mating – no corruption of morals
“what happens when you bring one person into the fold who doesn’t respect the integrity of the effort”
you resonate more with people who share your water basis / source
rhine means “pure”
once usury is adopted by (or morals corrupted within) a civilization, that civilization will fail, just a matter of time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2tdmgQVXhM
The Oera Linda Book is a controversial text purported to be a historical and religious manuscript from ancient Frisia, a region in what is now the Netherlands and Germany. It claims to date back to antiquity, with some proponents suggesting it dates back as far as 2194 BCE, although most scholars believe it to be a forgery from the 19th century.
The Oera Linda Book consists of a series of writings that cover various topics, including the history, mythology, and laws of the Frisian people. It purports to contain information about the origins of humanity, the founding of Frisia, and the moral and ethical principles guiding Frisian society.
Some interpretations of the Oera Linda Book suggest that it contains instructions or guidance on how to maintain freedom and uphold certain principles of governance and morality. However, due to the controversial and contested nature of the text, interpretations vary widely, and its authenticity and historical accuracy remain highly debated.
Jan Ott is one of the proponents of the Oera Linda Book, and he has contributed to discussions and interpretations of its content. The Solari Report, hosted by Catherine Austin Fitts, may have featured discussions or interviews with Ott or others regarding the Oera Linda Book and its significance.
Overall, the Oera Linda Book continues to fascinate researchers and enthusiasts interested in ancient history, mythology, and alternative perspectives on European cultural heritage. However, its authenticity remains a subject of skepticism and debate within academic and historical circles.